Categories

Archives

Murphy Came Through On The Healthcare Vote

So while things have been quiet around here, I’ve been following the healthcare debate closely. Kucinich’s change of heart mid last week coincided with mine, and so I was pleased with Representative Scott Murphy’s decision to vote in favor – and relieved when the final tallies were announced late last night.

My line of thinking is now along the lines that this legislation is (or at least, can be, optimistically assuming the best possible outcome – a great leap of faith) better than nothing. Nothing, coming after more than a year of effort on the part of the Democrats, always the consummate lesser of two evils. A failure here, pragmatically spelling the end of Hope with a capital H, and putting any future reform efforts on the back burner for another decade plus.

With two-thousand plus pages of legislation, I won’t make any claims to understanding anything beyond the easily digestible bullet points being paraded in the news. Earlier, I became hopeful that this legislation would actually affect me in the near term, with the clause allowing dependent children to stay on their parent’s plans till the age of 26. I am most definitely still dependent on my parents, and I am also under the age of 26 for another whopping three months. My eagerness to get back on the roles isn’t borne from my pre-existing condition (T2 diabetes – still very much under control), but for the recent ultimatum on my wisdom teeth – they’s gotsta go! (For years their place was secure, since apparently I have the jaw line and accompanying mouth space of one of homo sapien’s earlier ancestors. But while the top pair have come in fine, the bottoms still aren’t completely through, and the determination has been made that they need to come out. And the older I get, the less chance of my gums healing properly.)

But from what I can tell, this piece of the healthcare legislation won’t be applicable in my case. First off, although this is purportedly one of the pieces enacted immediately, I still found word that there is a six month grace period involved. Secondly, I can’t figure out whether this is applicable at all for all of the 21-26 year olds who’ve already been kicked off – can we just sign back on, or are we in a loophole? Thirdly, the wisdom teeth would most likely be deemed a “pre-existing condition” and not covered even if I was able to get insured for the next three months. (Pre-existing conditions will be a thing of the past for adults by 2014, children (real children) immediately.) Fourthly, and last, I just found out that New York has already had legislation that allows unmarried children to remain on their parent’s insurance – until the age of 30!

I don’t recall what age I was when I was kicked off of my parent’s insurance. It seemed an arbitrary age, and I remember it being before I even graduated from college. While attending, I had some very low cost plan associated with the college and assumed it would cover anything catastrophic. And I was uninsured when diagnosed with diabetes two years ago. I am not enthused at my chances of being re-enrolled, as the current for-profit healthcare system stands to gain nothing by having me insured getting proper medical treatment at an affordable cost. Therein lies the fundamental problem, an issue never at task over the past year of partisan squabbling.

Still, although I am yet another instance of an uninsured individual who will likely see nothing come from this legislation in the short term, I feel like I can only hope for the best in that the CBO estimates show some savings to be had, long term, nationally. If this effort was sunk, reform would not be attempted again, and this would undoubtedly result in a worsening of the crippled system – by the CBO’s own estimates. Further skyrocketing costs, millions more uninsured, more and more of the same.

It is hard to feel any satisfaction, or to even see this as a “victory.” Healthcare reform has been a significant issue for me for several election cycles. Watching the political process over the past year neuter the most substantial reforms has been disheartening. This legislative success looks to do nothing for the thousands still dying for lack of care. Perhaps the sense of victory will hold them over until 2014 or whenever the applicable parts of the bill come into effect. Premiums will surely increase astronomically while health insurance companies have free reign to do so.

Watching the whole debacle, I’m taken aback by the unscrupulousness of the Republicans, Waterloo-ing the issue the whole time; and by the emasculated nature of the Dems, incapable of passing substantial reform while in control of both Congress and the presidency. It’s hard to see how any progress can be made under this system.

Tom Tomorrow: What If… Dems & Repubs

This Modern World for August 18th:

What if Democrats behaved more like Republicans?

what if

Yup. Tom Tomorrow is a genius and, coincidentally, my hero. Guy creates a comic strip that is on the money, day after day after day.

“That’s Pretty Crazy”

Last Sunday on Meet The Press, I thought David Brooks was at moments unintentionally both humorous and insightful. At multiple points, Brooks resorted to using “crazy” or “insane” – in responding to a Limbaugh clip, Palin’s ‘death panel’ post on Facebook, and the regime in Iran. Simple, straightforward. Yup, I couldn’t have put it better. There are some real nutjobs making news these days.

The Chicken Littles are already decrying the end of Hope, as public support starts to slip for both healthcare reform and the White House itself. Let’s put it in perspective. Despite falling poll numbers, there is no alternative party to the Democrats. The mainstream media is doing their part to paint the loony fringe as the voice of the GOP, but their sensationalizing hits way too close to home. Scarily, the only rational Republicans left seem to be party cast outs, independents (Bloomberg), or those not seeking re-election (the majority of Repubs who broke ranks to support Sotomayor). Minority Leader John Boehner has made it abundantly, explicitly clear that Congressional Republicans will not be in the business of legislating over the next four years. (Maybe this shouldn’t come as a surprise, considering that Bush decided to not lead the country for eight years.) The disheartening part is not asinine GOP leadership, but the way in which elected officials follow that leadership lockstep, heedless of the effect to their constituents or the country as a whole.

With Obama actually wielding power and under the constraints of political realities, it’s no surprise that a certain amount of “re-disillusionment” is kicking in. For the people prepared to take a rational look at things, I need only point to the bizarre alternate reality where McCain and Palin were in charge over the past seven months. (Add four points to unemployment, half the Dow Jones, and throw in a few launched nuclear ICBMs, and you’re almost there.)

With the Republican opposition’s infantile refusal to do their jobs, ostensibly denying each Dem-sponsored bill to come along, the White House needs to take a firmer role in directing Congress and focusing the debate. Bipartisanship comes second to constructive lawmaking, and the two become mutually exclusive when one side decides to play the dunce.

Stimulus Plan: What Up?

This morning I watched Bobby Jindal and Charlie Crist on Meet The Press – two Republican governors toting different positions on the federal stimulus package. Jindal towed the party line, refusing support pending major concessions over the very nature of the plan. He hinged Republican support on whether or not spending was temporary, a position 180 degrees at odds with the views governing many Dems. (See Robert Reich)

Republicans don’t win much by voting nay along party lines. So there must be something pretty unreasonable with the plan, right?

Check ProPublica’s chart detailing spending (a bit more manageable than the full 1,071 page document). Spending categories include:

$98,325,000,000 — Transportation and Infrastructure
$58,355,000,000 — Aid to State and Local Governments
$48,420,000,000 — Education
$41,400,000,000 — Energy
$36,910,807,000 — Aid to People Affected by Economic Downturn
$18,830,000,000 — Health Care
$13,142,000,000 — Science and Technology
$2,147,000,000 — Other
$870,000,000 — Business
$323,500,000 — Accountability

All categories are broken down into (slightly) more detailed spending, and ProPublica also has a chart of all proposed tax cuts if you’re so inclined. Most big ticket items seem reasonable to me, but there are plenty of ways to screw the pooch between planning and execution. I’d probably keep an eye on ShovelWatch, to follow whether stimulus dollars are put to good use, if I was you.

Got Stimulus Blues? Chalk It Up To Fundamental Differences

Support for Obama’s stimulus plan has slipped markedly in the past two weeks, according to recent Rasmussen polling. The news cycle has been dominated with Republicans pushing tax cuts and balking at arguable spending. Not a single one could even be swayed in the House to vote for the plan. Partisan politics and stimulus plans got you down? Don’t let it – this is indicative of a fundamental difference between conservatives and reality:

Once the Stimulus Kicks In, the Real Fight Begins by Robert Reich

Obama is facing the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Even fiscal conservatives concede that when consumers stop buying and businesses stop investing, as they are now, the government must step in as the buyer and lender of last resort.

But the moment the economy appears to be on the mend, conservatives such as Feldstein will want the government to cut spending. In their view, this is the only way to get the economy fully back on track. But others believe that it is precisely the track we were on that got us into this mess in the first place.

Those who support the stimulus as a desperate measure to arrest the downward plunge in the business cycle might be called cyclists. Others, including me, see the stimulus as the first step toward addressing deep structural flaws in the economy. We are the structuralists. These two camps are united behind the current stimulus, but may not be for long. Cyclists blame the current crisis on a speculative bubble that threw the economy’s self-regulating mechanisms out of whack. They say that we can avoid future downturns if the Fed pops bubbles earlier by raising interest rates when speculation heats up.

But structuralists see it very differently. The bursting of the housing bubble caused the current crisis, but the underlying problem began much earlier — in the late 1970s, when median U.S. incomes began to stall. Because wages got hit then by the double-whammy of global competition and new technologies, the typical American family was able to maintain its living standard only if women went into the workforce in larger numbers, and later, only if everyone worked longer hours.

Robert Reich continues, illustrating how economic conservatives are naturally less inclined to support a stimulus plan that results in long-term sustainable economic growth. Read it.

All talk of America’s common interest aside, contrasting ideologies means different paths to separate goals. The paradox of Reagan conservatives: if you believe government to be the problem, your natural inclination is to run it into the ground. Joe Brewer on commondreams.org:

The narrow reporting on current Congressional politicking would lead one to believe that conservatives simply want a different bill to be passed. By now it should be clear that this just isn’t the case. The truth is that conservatives want to be sure Obama and his progressive colleagues at all levels of government are not able to do their jobs. Imagine what would happen if Obama succeeded at delivering money to state and city officials to build mass transit, generate renewable energy, and provide affordable health care to the populace. This would be the fulfillment of government’s moral mission – to protect and empower our citizens.

A successful progressive Obama presidency would mean a fundamental shift in American politics: the pendulum’s long, slow motion back from Reagan’s own revolution.

Social Security?

Tired of the Republican spin of social security? Don’t feel like privitization will solve a damn thing? There Is No Crisis is combatting the Bush administration’s relentless attacks on social security. Bookmark it for an up-to-date resource linking the latest articles, news stories, and studies refuting the Bush claims.

TIME’s latest poll gives some indication of what Bush faces: 49% of respondents said they disapprove of the President’s handling of Social Security, while only 40% said they approve. And that’s before Bush has even put forward the details of his plan. Nonetheless, the President has begun his assault—personally and through a cadre of emissaries from Vice President Dick Cheney to Treasury Secretary John Snow—labeling Social Security a “crisis” that must be fixed. “First step,” Bush told TIME last month, “is to make sure everybody understands we have a problem.”

mmhmmm. You do need more support before you can make a move, Bushy.

There Is No Crisis found via Latte: The Blog for the Liberal Elite