Categories

Archives

Rendition; Justine Sharrock In Mother Jones

I watched Rendition last night and was relieved. It frays my nerves any time Hollywood does anything remotely political and timely, and I was prepared for some ham-fisted Bruce Willis politick, where the torture is ultimately justified and everyone goes home relieved, the ticking time bomb avoided. This wasn’t the case, and it was fairly entertaining to boot.

Today the March / April 2008 issue of Mother Jones arrived, and it has a very excellent feature by Justine Sharrock, titled Am I a Torturer? Sharrock follows two representative veterans who’re conflicted about their time spent in Iraq, “softening up” prisoners under the direction of their superiors. Media coverage of US-sponsored torture has slid off the radar these days, but the aftereffects are still being felt by all involved.

As of today’s date, the latest issue of Mother Jones isn’t online yet, but I encourage people to check back and hopefully they’ll post this article in its entirety.

Rendition Back In The News

Rice defends US terror policies

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has admitted that terror suspects are flown abroad for interrogation, but denied they were tortured.

She said suspects were moved by plane under a process known as rendition, and said this was “a lawful weapon”.

But she refused to address claims that the CIA runs secret prisons abroad where suspects are interrogated without reference to international law.

She then flew to Europe, where she can expect tough questions on the issue.

Her first stop is Germany, where parliament has demanded to know the purpose of more than 400 flights, run by the US military, that landed or passed through German airspace.

She will also visit Romania – where human rights groups allege a detention centre from may have been located – and Brussels, where the EU has written to Washington asking for further details about US flights.

Indignant

Ms Rice made a robust defence of US policy, reflecting indignation that anyone would accuse it of condoning torture, says the BBC’s Clive Myrie in Washington.

She said the US would use “every lawful weapon to defeat these terrorists”, who were often essentially stateless and did not fit into any traditional military or criminal justice system.

“We have had to adapt,” she declared.

But she said the US always respected the sovereignty of allies, abided by the law and did not allow torture.

Our correspondent says Ms Rice’s tour of Europe will probably see her pressing her hosts for more co-operation, and less criticism, in the “war on terror”.

‘Lives saved’

She refused to address the question of secret prisons directly.

“We cannot discuss information that would compromise the success of intelligence, law enforcement, and military operations. We expect other nations share this view,” she said in a statement at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland.

She said renditions had been carried out for decades between the US and its allies.

“Renditions take terrorists out of action, and save lives,” she said. “Such renditions are permissible under international law.”

The secretary of state said European countries often benefited from, and even assisted, US intelligence-gathering.

“The intelligence so gathered has stopped terrorist attacks and saved innocent lives – in Europe as well as in the United States and other countries,” she said.

She said European countries needed to decide what measures were acceptable in defending themselves from terrorism.

“It is up to those governments and their citizens to decide if they wish to work with us to prevent terrorist attacks against their own country or other countries, and decide how much sensitive information they can make public. They have a sovereign right to make that choice.

“So now before the next attack,” she said, “we should all face the hard choices that democratic governments face”.

I find the entire thing sickening and hypocritical. It is fucked up on so many levels. But this is not new information. See Mahar Arar’s personal account of being sent to Syria for torture. Or check out Human Rights Watch on the matter.

Canadian Suing US Because Of “Rendition” To Syria, Story Corroborated.

Suit by Detainee on Transfer to Syria Finds Support in Jet’s Log

WASHINGTON — Maher Arar, a 35-year-old Canadian engineer, is suing the United States, saying American officials grabbed him in 2002 as he changed planes in New York and transported him to Syria where, he says, he was held for 10 months in a dank, tiny cell and brutally beaten with a metal cable.

Now federal aviation records examined by The New York Times appear to corroborate Mr. Arar’s account of his flight, during which, he says, he sat chained on the leather seats of a luxury executive jet as his American guards watched movies and ignored his protests.

The tale of Mr. Arar, the subject of a yearlong inquiry by the Canadian government, is perhaps the best documented of a number of cases since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in which suspects have accused the United States of secretly delivering them to other countries for interrogation under torture. Deportation for interrogation abroad is known as rendition.

In papers filed in a New York court replying to Mr. Arar’s lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers say the case was not one of rendition but of deportation. They say Mr. Arar was deported to Syria based on secret information that he was a member of Al Qaeda, an accusation he denies.

The discovery of the aircraft, in a database compiled from Federal Aviation Agency records, appears to corroborate part of the story Mr. Arar has told many times since his release in 2003. The records show that a Gulfstream III jet, tail number N829MG, followed a flight path matching the route he described. The flight, hopscotching from New Jersey to an airport near Washington to Maine to Rome and beyond, took place on Oct. 8, 2002, the day after Mr. Arar’s deportation order was signed.

After seeing a photograph of the plane and hearing its path, Mr. Arar, 35, of Ottawa, said in a telephone interview: “I think that’s it. I think you’ve found the plane that took me.”

( read more )

:shock: