Categories

Archives

Tired Of The Tea Baggers?

Fatigued by the tea? Looking for a movement named after a drink popular with 21st century Americans? Look no further than the Coffee Party, a sorta-lame-at-first-glance rejoinder with a lot more going for it once you skim the surface:

Many of us had the same thought: the tactics being employed by the Tea Party movement are not likely to produce solutions to the problems that we face as a nation, and we urgently need an alternative.

It’s very hard to get people to rally around a new idea. But here I am reminding them of something that they already know: that we are all Americans. We should not divide ourselves over differences of opinion. We need to be one community. Our democracy is what unites us as a people. We must protect it, and to protect it we must engage in the political process, respecting the reality that we are diverse nation with diverse points of view.

- Annabel Park,  founder of Coffee Party USA, via a live Q&A at the Washington Post

My initial reaction when getting the Facebook invite was of the “oh, that’s cute” nature. But with all the talk of participatory democracy, civic engagement, and public discourse, this nascent movement appears to be more Public Policy 201, less hysteric “Down Wit Gubment” herd mentality. And I can get behind any movement that actually addresses an issue at hand, of our fractured, tug-of-war method of governance. The schizoid two party system we have would seem amusing, but for actually living here and paying the taxes to support it.

Particularly disheartening this week was David Gregory, on Meet The Press doing his part to discredit the Mainstream Media, blithely glossing over all public opinion outside of the Tea Bagger movement, proclaiming that, “The only protests you’ve seen publicly are on the right in opposition to the [healthcare] bill.”

Truly, this would only be the case if your sole window on the world was the 6 o’clock news. Not only do I subscribe to newsletters of national movements in favor of reform (Healthcare-NOW!), but I have seen and heard of protest efforts coming from the left and center, across my local region. From demonstrations at the state Capitol, to the street corners of routes I take every day, there demonstrably are people frustrated at current national affairs, who still fall far short of the fanatical “fly a plane into an IRS building” stripe.

To say that the Right are the only ones expressing themselves is a fundamental failure of journalism, which purportedly exists to deliver news, not craft it as the NY Times has with New York’s coming gubernatorial election. I posit that perhaps 20th century news structures would not be in the dire straits they’re in if they were doing a better job at the close of the century. (Sometimes it feels like I only blog to contradict the notion of the blogosphere as a vast right-wing echo-chamber.)

The Tea Party is not an issue-based group per se, as far as limited or nonexistent government can be considered an “issue” (I consider it an ideology). It’s bizarre to think of Righties as sign-toting protesters, but then I can certainly empathize with the emotions of disconnect with government and the free press. They’re failing us all. Coffee is arguably the better direction; otherwise, politicos and big biz (I mean, the media) will continue to eagerly play us as fools. We need a fundamental redress of the systems at play, because TARP didn’t address the problems of Wall Street, and likewise with the stimulus and our economy. And while I’m not loony enough to proclaim government “the problem,” a nonfunctioning one certainly contributes to our ills.

The Conservative Echo Chamber

Looking at the main news stories of the day can make your head spin. Obama’s planned televised pep talk has been churned into a massive indoctrination plot. His adviser on green jobs, Van Jones, resigns for signing a petition, with Congressman Mike Pence saying that, “His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate.” Cheney, meanwhile, continues to pardon each new brutality revealed to have occurred during his watch. (Power drills? Condonable? Really?) And on the healthcare front, all indications are to expect major concessionary overtones the next time Obama comes on air.

As the guy on Meet The Press said today: at some point, you just look at some of the headlines of the day and think, “That’s flat out stupid.”

I’d say it’s bizarre, and we’ve been here for awhile. Recent news cycles have been on a rightward spiral since the perceived stall in healthcare reform. It’s the hard right segment of the public that’s framing every debate right now.

On healthcare, I’m feeling more and more ambivalent about said efforts. I had enough concerns about a “robust” public option. But for it to be crippled or completely axed? Expanded Medicare for people deemed unprofitable to insure, operating under the current rules of the game, will result in huge, unsustainable government bloat. So OK – go the incremental route. But make sure to drop the ‘substantial’ from before the Health Insurance Reform banners.

For certain, there would be a much smaller cost of implementing reforms absent any direct gov’t effort to insure more people. Incremental reform for incremental results. The public option fails mostly because it’s an additional cost to the taxpayer, above and beyond their current exorbitant insurance premiums. Place the burden only on the $250k+’ers? Fine, “tax the rich,” but it’s disingenuous way to fund reform. And no plan currently being floated in the mainstream ensures access to everyone. I’ll go ahead and beat the dead horse: a single-payer system paid equitably (based on ability, allowing a progressive curve) would be healthcare paid for by the people using it.

Why can’t we have an honest discussion about the way we already spend our healthcare dollars? Serious reform efforts may mean increased government spending, but hysterically delineating between private and public sidesteps the real issue of out-of-control costs.

Canada’s healthcare expenses under their single-payer system are similarly outpacing inflation – but that’s a worldwide trend, and their’s is to a lesser extent than our private insurance boondoggle. Their government is doing a better job of reigning in costs than our market system. If Americans are so lousy at self-governance that we can’t insure our own citizens, who are we to be dictating terms to Afghans? Hell, we oppose their sole source of real income, poppies. :roll:

Healthcare, Compromised

Overhauling our healthcare system has been part of my agenda for ages now. I’ve never been too optimistic about its chances. As Obama came in and started to say all the right things, I began to have hope. But after flipping through the alternative press, those hopes are again dashed…

My main fear is of severely compromised reform, destined for failure. Getting everyone’s “OK” will mean flawed legislation. Make no mistake about it – single-payer systems are working the best in other countries, and Americans are not as unique as we’d all like to think. Single payer has already been introduced, by Rep. John Conyers. It’s H.R. 676, The United States National Health Care Act. Spread the word – like to the lawmakers supposed to be working for you.

Unconvinced single-payer is the way to go? The case for single-payer, made ad nauseum:

Comment by Dr. Don McCanne, PNHP Senior Health Policy Fellow:

Once again, fiscal analysis shows that the models of reform that build on our highly flawed, fragmented system of financing health care actually increase health care spending while falling far short on the goals of reform. In contrast, the single payer model would provide truly comprehensive care for absolutely everyone while significantly reducing health care spending.

The thing that got me excited and optimistic in the first place is the change in public opinion concerning healthcare. One thing Obama has done well is to make the case for reform in financial terms. Will he follow through with garbage reform when there’s the opportunity for so much more? Say it ain’t so.

The Selling of Single-Payer Features, by Helen Redmond, Counterpunch.org
The sea change in the public’s attitude toward government financed health care, however, has gotten press. A New York Times poll in June found that 72 percent supported a government-administered insurance plan – like Medicare for everyone under the age of 65. That poll also reported 64 percent believed the federal government should guarantee coverage to the entire population, i.e. health care should be a human right. Another interesting number: 85 percent of respondents said the health care system needed to be fundamentally changed or completely rebuilt. This is in stark contrast to President Obama’s position of tepid, incremental reform.