Categories

Archives

Murphy Came Through On The Healthcare Vote

So while things have been quiet around here, I’ve been following the healthcare debate closely. Kucinich’s change of heart mid last week coincided with mine, and so I was pleased with Representative Scott Murphy’s decision to vote in favor – and relieved when the final tallies were announced late last night.

My line of thinking is now along the lines that this legislation is (or at least, can be, optimistically assuming the best possible outcome – a great leap of faith) better than nothing. Nothing, coming after more than a year of effort on the part of the Democrats, always the consummate lesser of two evils. A failure here, pragmatically spelling the end of Hope with a capital H, and putting any future reform efforts on the back burner for another decade plus.

With two-thousand plus pages of legislation, I won’t make any claims to understanding anything beyond the easily digestible bullet points being paraded in the news. Earlier, I became hopeful that this legislation would actually affect me in the near term, with the clause allowing dependent children to stay on their parent’s plans till the age of 26. I am most definitely still dependent on my parents, and I am also under the age of 26 for another whopping three months. My eagerness to get back on the roles isn’t borne from my pre-existing condition (T2 diabetes – still very much under control), but for the recent ultimatum on my wisdom teeth – they’s gotsta go! (For years their place was secure, since apparently I have the jaw line and accompanying mouth space of one of homo sapien’s earlier ancestors. But while the top pair have come in fine, the bottoms still aren’t completely through, and the determination has been made that they need to come out. And the older I get, the less chance of my gums healing properly.)

But from what I can tell, this piece of the healthcare legislation won’t be applicable in my case. First off, although this is purportedly one of the pieces enacted immediately, I still found word that there is a six month grace period involved. Secondly, I can’t figure out whether this is applicable at all for all of the 21-26 year olds who’ve already been kicked off – can we just sign back on, or are we in a loophole? Thirdly, the wisdom teeth would most likely be deemed a “pre-existing condition” and not covered even if I was able to get insured for the next three months. (Pre-existing conditions will be a thing of the past for adults by 2014, children (real children) immediately.) Fourthly, and last, I just found out that New York has already had legislation that allows unmarried children to remain on their parent’s insurance – until the age of 30!

I don’t recall what age I was when I was kicked off of my parent’s insurance. It seemed an arbitrary age, and I remember it being before I even graduated from college. While attending, I had some very low cost plan associated with the college and assumed it would cover anything catastrophic. And I was uninsured when diagnosed with diabetes two years ago. I am not enthused at my chances of being re-enrolled, as the current for-profit healthcare system stands to gain nothing by having me insured getting proper medical treatment at an affordable cost. Therein lies the fundamental problem, an issue never at task over the past year of partisan squabbling.

Still, although I am yet another instance of an uninsured individual who will likely see nothing come from this legislation in the short term, I feel like I can only hope for the best in that the CBO estimates show some savings to be had, long term, nationally. If this effort was sunk, reform would not be attempted again, and this would undoubtedly result in a worsening of the crippled system – by the CBO’s own estimates. Further skyrocketing costs, millions more uninsured, more and more of the same.

It is hard to feel any satisfaction, or to even see this as a “victory.” Healthcare reform has been a significant issue for me for several election cycles. Watching the political process over the past year neuter the most substantial reforms has been disheartening. This legislative success looks to do nothing for the thousands still dying for lack of care. Perhaps the sense of victory will hold them over until 2014 or whenever the applicable parts of the bill come into effect. Premiums will surely increase astronomically while health insurance companies have free reign to do so.

Watching the whole debacle, I’m taken aback by the unscrupulousness of the Republicans, Waterloo-ing the issue the whole time; and by the emasculated nature of the Dems, incapable of passing substantial reform while in control of both Congress and the presidency. It’s hard to see how any progress can be made under this system.

Dreamfields “Low Carb” Pasta

Pasta is typically one of the highest carb-containing foods you can find, and a big “no no” for any diabetic trying to control their BG levels (without injecting insulin). But through some wizardy best left unknown, Dreamfields markets their particular pasta as having only 5 “digestible” carbs per serving. After hearing good things, I was eager to try it out. So along with a jar of marinara, I picked up two boxes a few weeks ago. It tasted great, but what about the claims to be diabetic-friendly? My results? A pretty spectacular spike in my blood glucose levels. (Bad.)

Undaunted and desperate to add pasta back into my culinary repertoire, I decided to try once more, this time with a few things in mind:

  1. Portion control – I used to eat half a box of pasta without a care in the world. My portion of Dreamfields the first time around was still too large to get an accurate bearing on its effects.
  2. Skipping the marinara – I didn’t check at the time of purchase, but my (former) favorite pasta sauce, Newman’s Own Sockarooni* has a decent amount of sugar, especially when you load it on.

So about a week ago, I tried again, this time with a simple margarine and cheese sauce. I made sure to limit myself to a serving (a bunch maybe the size of a quarter in diameter, uncooked). The results this time around?

  • 6:34PM ——– 62 mg/dL —— before dinner
  • Dinner at about 7pm, give or take.
  • 7:54PM ——– 116 mg/dL —– +1hr after dinner
  • 8:56PM ——– 84 mg/dL —— +2hr after
  • 9:52PM ——– 83 mg/dL —— +3hr

Groovy, no? I was running low before dinner with that 62, which muddies things. The rise (a 50mg/dL increase) isn’t that good, but I should have been in the 80s to begin with, and pretty much anything I ate would have elevated me out of the 60s which is a poor place to be.

The fatty margarine and cheese sauce would also necessarily slow the digestion of the carbs and the ensuring spike. But I imagine this factor was minimal since the overall curve was short and small. (Typically, fat will dampen the ensuring spike, but it won’t cancel it altogether, and you’ll still find elevated BG levels over a longer period of time with a high carb meal, fatty or not.)

So Dreamfields pasta lived up to the hype, at least in my case. As always, your mileage may vary, but it’s definitely worth a try for any diabetic abstaining from pasta altogether. (Or anyone on a low-carb kick for that matter.)

* that’s right, I (used to) like to kick it up a knotch with the SOCKAROONI… while contributing all profits to charity.

Health Rocks

When you get hit with type 2 diabetes, it’s a wake up call. It’s a great wake up call. This is because although diabetes isn’t a death sentence, it does carry the promise steadily declining health – unless you take control. It’s counter-productive to blame the diabetic for their condition, but the majority of type 2 cases today are caused in large part by sedentary lifestyles and poor diets (and the obesity that results).

Many people use a life-threatening event or illness to reevaluate their lives, and I might just be one of them. Skip this post if you’re not in the mood for mawkish, self-affirming drivel.*

I like to think that I took the diagnosis seriously last September, and I’m beginning to see the results. The back story: for more than five years, I’ve weighed about 185lbs. I was content here, my BMI was only a point or so past the “normal range,” and it was a good 20lbs(!) under what I had weighed at one point in High School (before becoming vegetarian). In a nation of fatties, I wasn’t that bad. Relativism at its finest.

However, in the past two or three months, I’ve lost an additional 15lbs, putting me at 170lbs dry (or wet for that matter) – an awesome weight for my 5’11″ frame. Since my diagnosis I’ve concentrated on getting more exercise. I bought a bicycle and was up to 30 mile day trips before I had to stop for the winter. Since then, I’ve been preoccupied with the daily rituals involved when you heat with wood. Hauling, stacking, splitting. It’s great anaerobic activity.

But most important has been the dietary changes. I’ve eliminated refined sugar, and greatly reduced my intake of starches and carbohydrates. Whenever possible, I choose lower carb, higher fiber options. I’ve also discovered that regardless of what you eat, portion control is key. All of this is remedial, but there’s a difference between understanding something on an intellectual level, and experiencing it.

All of these lifestyle changes have been paying dividends. I haven’t adopted any particular diet, but rather whatever makes sense from both the low carb and low glycemic index camps. And this has been very easy to do while sticking with the vegetarian thing.

The weight loss and better blood glucose control is tangible, the improvement in mood and general well-being is more difficult to appreciate. But it’s not a coincidence that we’re also one of the most doped up nations, and the links between mood and fitness are firmly established. The difficulty in changing the situation comes from the fact that the two are in a feedback loop, either positive or negative. Improving the health of the nation will require systemic changes, but on a personal level, I think I’ve got it nailed.

*That’s the first time I’ve ever used the word “mawkish.”

An Easier Diabetes Primer

This is intended to be a rather superficial overview of diabetes for those totally unfamiliar with the disease. Consider it the cliff-notes to the rather large wikipedia page or various other “primers” available on the web (the American Diabetes Association page for example, which seems more readable than wikipedia’s). I present this information in terms of what the non-diabetic probably doesn’t know – but might want to (and should). And in part, I’m writing this to better clarify it for myself. I’m bolding the first instances of important terms.

What is It?

Diabetes mellitus is a condition wherein a person’s ability to adequately control blood sugar (BS) levels in their blood is compromised.

Basic Physiology Lesson:

Most of the food we eat is turned into glucose (sugar) by the body via digestion, to be burned as energy.

Meanwhile, beta cells in the pancreas create insulin, a hormone which helps muscles and other cells to use glucose (insulin allows glucose to enter the cells). The proportion between glucose and insulin is important here, but fortunately the non-diabetic pancreas is very adept at producing just the right amount of insulin in proportion to the amount of glucose currently in our bodies. Glucose concentrations in our blood increase when we eat; the pancreas releases insulin in response to bring down glucose levels.

So it’s a balancing act. Not enough insulin, and the amount of glucose in the blood (our BS levels) increases (hyperglycemia). Too much insulin, and glucose levels decrease (hypoglycemia).

Diabetes is commonly divided into three main types: type 1, type 2, and gestational. (Recently there have been more subdivisions: type 1.5, pre-diabetes, and so on, but for our purposes these types can often be grouped under type 2.)

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease, meaning that the diabetic’s body attacks and destroys the insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. The reason(s) behind this are not clearly understood. The result, however, is that type 1 diabetics produce very little to no insulin, and must inject insulin daily from diagnosis till death. Before the early 20th-century (when injectable insulin was first introduced), type 1 diabetes was a death sentence. The Greeks described diabetes as “a melting down of the flesh and limbs,” as without enough insulin, cells burn themselves for energy.

Type 1 diabetes has at various times been referred to as juvenile diabetes or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Juvenile, because onset is often early on in a person’s life.

Type 2 diabetes is probably not an autoimmune disease. Instead, type 2 diabetics have, for a variety of reasons, insulin resistance (IR). They can produce as much – or even more – insulin than a non-diabetic. The insulin produced simply doesn’t work as well.

Type 2 diabetics may also not produce as much insulin. This can be the result of an as-yet unknown reason, or because of years of increased insulin production burning out their pancreas’ beta cells. (Type 2 diabetes might not be diagnosed for years. During this time, the pancreas will attempt to overcome the IR by producing a lot of insulin. This wears out the beta cells in the pancreas.)

Type 2 diabetes has been called adult- or maturity-onset diabetes, or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). These terms are increasingly irrelevant, however, as type 2 diabetes diagnoses increase rapidly in younger and younger patients, and as many with type 2 require insulin shots.

Gestational diabetes is often temporary, and a condition in pregnant women. Like type 2, this means IR and high BS levels. This can result in complications with the birth. Gestational diabetes affects between 3-10% of births, and the women are typically at a much higher risk for developing type 2 at a later date. It’s screened for during pregnancy.

In a sentence, diabetes is a disease where you do not have enough insulin (either in quantity or effectiveness) to normalize the BS levels in your body.

Why does It happen?

Type 1 diabetes is most times a product of genetics, but in some instances can be the product of virus infections (Coxsackie virus, german measles). The causes of type 2 are less clearly understood, but there are several risk factors which include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, and a large intake of calories or carbohydrates, depending on who you talk to (adoption of the “western diet.” What is eaten might not be as important as how much and whether it leads to obesity). There is also necessarily a genetic component to type 2. Some people will always be obese and sedentary and never get diabetes. Others will. Some diabetics aren’t obese or sedentary at all. About 80% of type 2s are overweight however, which seems to lead to IR and the slippery slope of diabetes and decreased pancreas function.

Age is also a factor. Pancreas function (like many things) decreases as we age. Racial minorities are statistically more prone to the disease than those of white European descent.

Because of the role genetics play and our still hazy understanding of the disease, most times it’s irrational and counter-productive to “blame” the diabetic for being overweight or having a poor diet. (Contrary to popular belief, sugar consumption itself has nothing to do with causing diabetes, unless it leads to weight gain.) Much of today’s research suggests the common trait of a “thifty” gene(s) among diabetics, which was great to have during times of famine, but today during times of plenty causes weight gain and IR.

About 10% of the diabetic population is type 1; the rest are type 2 and its various subtypes.

What happens?

The primary result of diabetes is out of control blood sugar (BS) levels (usually – high or hyperglycemia). Unchecked, this can result in a huge variety of illnesses.

The early warning signs are frequent urination (coupled with increased thirst), blurry or quickly failing vision, fatigue, and recurrent yeast infections. After years, the undiagnosed diabetic will begin to have more severe symptoms such as sores that won’t heal, numbness or tingling in extremities, kidney or cardiovascular problems, and further (more permanent) damage to the eyes. Weight loss occurs in type 1s.

The problem is that onset (of type 2) is slow and the disease is degenerative when left undiagnosed, so noticing these symptoms is difficult for someone who may otherwise feel healthy.

The primary goal when diagnosed is normalized BS levels. It is thought that increased or wildly fluctuating BS levels lead to most of the complications associated with diabetes.

A Word About Blood Sugar (BS) Levels And Testing:

Blood sugar, in the US, is measured in mg/dL – milligrams per deciliter. (Internationally, it’s mmol/L – millimoles per liter.) Normal fasting levels – when you haven’t been eating – for the non-diabetic are usually in the 70-100 mg/dL range (to be more precise, usually 80-90 mg/dL). In the hour or two after eating, a non-diabetic might see a spike to 120 or 140 mg/dL if they ate a lot of sugar or fast-acting starches.

For comparison, diabetic BS levels, out of control, might reach as high as 400, 500, or even higher. At these levels, a hospital stay is often warranted. The diabetic struggling with control might see numbers peak into the 200 mg/dL range weekly. All of the complications related to diabetes increase substantially as sustained BS levels increase. Even a non-diabetic with average numbers in the low 80s will have a smaller risk for associated complications than a non-diabetic in the 90s, statistically-speaking.

Naturally, there’s a whole host of diabetes-related lab-work beyond the scope of this post which tells a lot more about BS control and other important issues. But home testing of BS is critical to getting and maintaining good levels, especially in the first few months or years of living with the disease.

stock image

Testing a person’s blood sugar involves pricking a finger, getting a drop of blood onto a test strip, which is inserted into a small blood glucose monitor which “reads” the level of glucose in the blood. This reading tells the amount of glucose in the blood at that very moment. It’s relatively painless, easy, and the biggest cost is the test strip. (About $1 if you’re paying out of pocket, usually about 5 cents with insurance.) You’ve probably seen Wilford Brimley hawk testing supplies on TV.

Acute (short term) complications of diabetes include:

  • Ketoacidosis: increased amounts of ketones in the blood decrease the blood’s pH level, resulting in loss of consciousness, death
  • Nonketotic hyperosmolar coma: essentially, extreme dehydration in the cells, also requiring immediate hospitalization
  • Hypoglycemia: extremely low BS, which again results in loss of consciousness, coma, and death if not treated

Chronic (long-term) complications include:

Microvascular (damage to small blood vessels, or nerve damage)

  • retinopathy: extreme / total loss of vision
  • neuropathy: decreased sensitivity in extremities, in many cases leading to amputation and / or amyotrophy (muscle weakness)
  • nephropathy: kidney damage, eventually requiring dialysis if left untreated

Macrovascular (damage to large cells, or arteries. Atherosclerosis plays a large role.)

  • Coronary artery disease: heart attack
  • Cerebrovascular disease: stroke, or blood clot in the brain
  • Peripheral vascular disease: obstructions in major arteries outside the heart

Random Statistics:

Most diabetics die of heart disease or stroke, most have high blood pressure, and diabetes is the leading cause of new cases of blindness among adults (12,000 to 24,000 cases each year). More than 60% of non-traumatic lower-limb amputations occur on diabetics – that’s about 82,000 amputations in 2002.

Statistics courtesy of the National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse.

The World Health Organization estimates at least 171 million people around the world are diabetic, a number expected to double by 2030. In the US, the National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse estimates that 20.8 million Americans (about 7% of the population) have diabetes, with 6.2m of those undiagnosed. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that 1 in 3 Americans born after 2000 will develop diabetes in their lifetime.

All of this can be depressing and frightening for those recently diagnosed or families of. Skip to the “it’s really not all bad” section if you want the good news.

So what do You do?

Type 1 diabetes has no cure, type 2 diabetics can receive pancreas transplants. (Good luck finding a spare pancreas.) New cures and solutions are in the pipeline, but for today’s diabetic, controlling BS levels and diabetes boils down to two or three things (depending on the severity):

Diet – “Opinions are like assholes: everyone’s got one.”

The proper diabetic diet runs along similar lines. Sugar is drastically limited: that’s all anyone can agree on. The American Diabetic Association prescribes a fairly high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet similar to the traditional food pyramid. Many people adopt a “low” carbohydrate diet. This is because large amounts of carbs, especially starches, can spike BS levels drastically – even more so than table sugar in some cases. (Protein and fats do not increase blood sugar nearly as much or as quickly.) For the purpose of understanding diabetes, simply realize that the “proper” diet is a hotly contested issue.

Exercise

Exercise, both aerobic (ie. running) and anaerobic (ie. weightlifting) is essential for good blood glucose control. This is because it can both stimulate the beta cells of the pancreas (increasing insulin production) and decrease insulin resistance. Weight loss (a byproduct of exercise) also leads to decreased IR, so it’s a positive feedback loop. Exercise also builds muscle, which uses (and stores) glucose at a much higher rate than other cells. The benefits of exercise (and weight loss) are well-documented.

Medication

A few decades ago, there were really only two options: sulfonylureas (developed shortly after World War II), and shooting insulin. Today, in addition to these, we have meglitinides and phenylalanine derivatives, biguanides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones – “just to name a few.” Most are oral, some are injected similar to insulin.

When insulin was first developed, it was modified from cows and pigs. Today, only human insulin is approved for use in the US. Most are analogs (lab-grown). There is a huge variety in insulin, both basal (for when you’re fasting) and bosol (injecting before meals), of varying lengths and rates of absorption.

Medications for diabetes work either by reducing insulin resistance, increasing insulin production (or quantity, in the case of injecting insulin), or reducing glucagon (a hormone, made by alpha cells in the pancreas, which increases glucose in the blood). Determining what medication works and in what quantities is really decided on a case-by-case process.

It’s really not all bad

Diabetes is a chronic condition and care is full-time for the rest of the diabetic’s life. The good news is, that with normalizing BS levels, the risks and complications can be minimized, and the diabetic can lead an entirely normal life free of amputations or blindness. Sometimes, being diagnosed with a terminal disease can be the best thing that happens to a person. It puts things into perspective: the impermanence of life, the renewed desire of living every day to the fullest, and the importance of good health which includes diet and exercise.

Post-script: If you’re still bummed out, go back and read the post again – pronouncing diabetes like Wilford Brimley – “dia-bee-TUS.”

For more Information

David Mendosa created one of the first and still best resources on the internet at www.mendosa.com. Inside you’ll find links to practically every other significant page on diabetes on the internet. Other resources have already been linked to, including the ADA and NDIC.

“Health” Category Added

So about two months ago I did a quick post saying I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, but that I wouldn’t make it a centerpiece of this blog. Well, as this site is a clearinghouse of all things moi, it turns out that as I learn more and fully deal with the disease, I feel the need more and more to write about it. So I’ve created a “health” category.

It won’t be strictly diabetes-related, however. I’ll be going back through the archives and adding anything “health”-related. I’ll be liberal with the definition, as I am with most definitions and things in general. :razz:

I foresee more interesting links to news stories and articles, and occasionally a handwritten (OK, handtyped) post on the more misunderstood aspects of diabetes.

Nobody reads the blog anyway: who cares if it goes in 20 random directions instead of only 19?